Free money psych.

 

Money is based on psychological debt*.

*A Theory.

MONEY...

Of due course it is pertinent to start with a brief overview of that which I intend to discuss before the theoretical elements can be appreciated in context.

Firstly a cursory glance at the meaning of the word Money.

In short Money is a medium of exchange and or something with a socially acceptable kind of store value.

You can look up the actual dictionary definition if you want to argue the basis.

Then to clarify one must also recognise there was a time before the above mentioned existed, in fact there are some who would argue that trade and barter were precursors to the concept and they are only partially wrong. IMO.

So before we can conceive of money or currency as a species we need a reason to do so, It is widely accepted that counting records or accounting if you will, came before the written language.

It makes sense, before the need to convey ideas or thoughts in the longer term our species would need to learn about and record numbers of things.

Numbers of things being as many as the stars, but also how many things you traded or how many stones are worth a log, perhaps how many oranges are worth how many apples. 

We do know the earliest evidenced records are of such a nature as to compare goods and services, they're clay tablets that detail land leases/recognised ownership, and or debt trading.

For example the loan of seed to plant a crop measured in work hours, if the crop fails the borrower has to pay back the debt in hours of toil. 

These kind of records appear before a written language or the concept of recording ideas or language.

Accounting is critical to the thought process which eventually results in what we now recognise as money. 

But again we have to consider before that, before written records altogether there was only a promise or an agreement if that could even be achieved.

A debt would simply be a concept of imagination, a thought and or moral obligation, and what faulty lines must it run with no record.

For example I gave you 10 oranges for one apple today but you promised to give me 9 more apples later, with no record you can excuse yourself of debt and I have no recourse but violence, to take my due apples by any means, or accept the loss, a bad deal.

In this way money is clearly a very good appeasement strategy against violence, if a case for debt can be proved and paid, violence need not be an outcome, or perhaps you can work it off, numerous options apart from death exist with money.

However the incentive to steal or fight your way out of debt clearly sit on the other end of that seesaw.

If we go back far enough you can see past situations even today, You can see the child who creates psychological debt among even siblings, eventually the older child will give back the toy stolen from the younger child whether or not they are told too by mum n dad, just to shut the kid up.

Conversely if the younger sibling no longer shows interest in the toy, the older kid will too.

There in is the emotional value of the item and debt springs that I would suggest all concepts of money flow from, and I only half jokingly refer to them as "Feeling wells."

Now picture this scenario if you haven't yet seen it you're to young to notice.

A 5 year old is swinging a stick and accidentally hits their 4 year old younger sibling, apologies are in order, hugs and cuddles perhaps kiss the boo boo you get the picture.

Now replace it with a deliberate smack, and a 6 year old knows the 7 year old did it deliberately. 

The situation changes drastically, now 6 year old is not happy with an apology and rejects a hug or kiss, now the 6 year old threatens to tell mum and dad, so 7 says you can hit me back and gives them the stick, we'll be even.

But no, 6 doesn't want to inflict pain back (it's the first baby Jesus), or just not while they have the dibber dobber card in this exchange, Now the 7 has to get cunning, before toys etc you could imagine the conscious debt, perhaps you have had it, that idea you need to make things right and atone for your sin.

At this point it might be as simple as collecting a few flowers or sharing a toy, anything the person wronged covets that will make them happy, or square the emotional debt. 

See where I am going with this yet ?

Oranges and apples are all well and good for ideas and the language written that you are reading now, however emotional debt is as valid as any other exchange right back to prostitution. 

Exploitation is only unfair trade by perception, and in a counter intuitive twist it is and has been extremely profitable to many, Look around you. 

In this way exploitation could be considered an older occupation than prostitution.

It should be blatantly obvious to anyone over 20 years old, the exploited or those who can convince others that they are a victim in any form hold the moral and or emotional high ground, this creates a perception of debt, Like the 6 year old previously mentioned.

Now before we get too far ahead, remembering there is a flip side to every coin, not all of the basis is a negative or debt, I will try to explain the congruent and equally applicable factor of a positive or reward later.

Examples of negative debt should not be hard for the discernible reader to find among society as we know it to this very day.

In fact I am willing to bet (another form of exchange) that everyone reading has at some point felt the painful sting of acquiring a debt that seemed unfair, in the sense that the value of the debt was more than anticipated to achieve agreement and balance.

A soccer game will do, everyone has seen the exaggerated fall or injury by a player seeking to turn the game in their favour via a penalty free kick. 

Extend this thinking to all things of monetary or psychological exchange.

The victim is the creditor, They use suffering or question the balance of what is fair to create a debt, then use that to their advantage within the game.

In this way we can all see the rules being a tool that is easily manipulated to create advantage or what is commonly called "privilege" by the people of the world who self identify perpetually as "oppressed".. 

Now enter the magical word of the day in 2025 and beyond, Compensation. 

With the philosophy and ideology now firmly cemented in writing contained in and not limited to laws, constitutions, contracts (including verbal agreements), acceptance of terms and conditions and even retrospective interpretations of socially acceptable behaviour out of the way, we can understand why compensation does or does not exist.

Without the aggrieved there is no case for compensation. 

Ask a 6 year old. 

If the aggrieved can make a case profitable based on perception like the fallen soccer player they will, and those who guard the rules will be the deciders even arbitrators or creators of laws which determine when and who deserves compensation for what.

Conversely they decide who is punishable or deserved of a fine and what for, think CO2 or climate change and you will have to pay a tax for that etc.

This is why money is not as simple transaction as many think, because it in of itself is based on negative debt in as many cases as it is based on positive reward. 

The job done is not always fairly rewarded, a global history of slavery demonstrates this as well as any form of peonage or debt repayment. 

In Walter Map's 12th-century work De nugis curialium. He wrote, "leave no good deed unpunished, no bad one unrewarded,"

Alluding to the unfairness of what we might call exchange rates today.

It was not long ago a human being could be sold or purchased like cattle or so many chickens. 

I would argue the concept of recording things or even people as having monetary value helped Europeans become the leaders of the anti human slavery movement before during and after they themselves abolished the formerly legal concept. 

However this was quickly replaced with a value on work and the former slave was simply compensated in a different way.

Today it might be called a wage or earnings, aka compensation for time, or services rendered, and it is worth noting that the service sector in our modern economy in Australia is 63 to 65% of GDP.

By comparison Agriculture, forests and fisheries are only about 2 to 2.4% of GDP because farmers can't produce emotional and psychological debt, That's up the the marketing department.

Even the basis, the producer is at the mercy of the "market" a market which demands to be compensated simply for participating via taxes on input, marketing fees, regulation, compliance's,sales tax, transport tax, income tax, organisation levies, auction fees, etc etc etc.

It is or now should be blatantly obvious that the kids who cry the most get the biggest scoop of ice cream with extra toppings. 

Look around you and debate me in the comments, (I probably wont reply), be honest with yourself, who do you see succeeding ?

Here is a question no one likes, if you have issues with racism refer to (https://jaymanwayne42.blogspot.com/2024/09/only-retards-call-people-racist.html) don't try to involve me.

Globally some scholars argue there is no hierarchy of oppression historically, but a 1 minute google search will give you examples of historically oppressed groups ? 

Rhetorical but if you figure out their dichotomy, I don't want to know. 

So the question is that since Indigenous peoples, Racial, Religious & Ethnic minorities are given as examples of oppressed groups today, who would you deduce are the beneficiaries of the most "compensation" world wide ?

The answer is quite clearly in the question...

Now with all that in mind consider the way in which this can be extrapolated today.

Look around you, if you can't see it you have issues, from your "smart TV" with "Free" viewing options full of ads for Save the whales, dolphins, sharks, tigers (insert animal here) or you can "adopt" a child or even a koala for fucks sake. How is this not insulting to the intelligence of the viewers is a good metric for the IQ of those who keep viewing.

The fact is you can't log in to an online social media without seeing a Go Fund ME post so much so Facebook now has direct links to the Buy Me a coffee and every bloody website in existence has a DONATE NOW icon with a sob story about some poor victim of society.

The fact is victimhood is still profitable, and money is just a convenient way for virtue signalers and the guilty alike to achieve the balance they need psychologically.

 

I wont go into global figures but in 2021 Registered Australian charities self reported the generation of $190 Billion with a capital B, This does not include unreported donations or what many auditors consider their greatest concern in the auditing process, which is quote "unaccountable cash donations".

In any case lets pretend there is no fraud, corruption, etc etc

This is $190 Billion that never improves any situation as is clearly evidenced by the fact that it continues to rise annually.

Meanwhile more and more people make claims for more and more compensation even when there is less actual victimisation occurring. 

Ask yourself why so many victims today, how did victim-hood become such a huge deal?

Victims create psychological debt.

Therefore it is my philosophy that the most success can be achieved from having the least amount of psychological debt.

The socialist is of course why socialism has never and will never work as a political ideology or reality, it preys on empathy and sympathy which inevitably runs out when there is no one left to compensate the person who formerly provided the compensation. 

"Everybody must give something back for something they get", is as universal as LIFE itself.

The genuine poor refugee has been robbed by the regular immigrant, The battered wife replaced by the simply unhappy one with financial incentives, children are used as pawns in a financial game of chess, and the one time welfare recipient has morphed into the long term welfare dependent...

Lastly there is an evident correlation between autism and financial high achievement.

With various conditions associated on the accepted Autism spectrum being closely linked to social issues such as misunderstanding, indifference, lack of and or inability to empathise or feel sympathy, is it really surprising they remain free of psychological debt?

This includes the $Billionaire class statistically. 

Conclusion.

The big bad world doesn't owe you a thing, and more importantly, You don't owe anyone so much as an explanation for your existence. 

Regards.

Jayman. W. Newell©05/Sept/2025

P.S. Golds value is subject to the emotional blackmail markets rates.